Hi @Robert_Miller - agree reducing inflation is required, and the asset value needs to be hardened.
But, as you said, EIP1559 is to solve a problem Fuse network doesn’t suffer from, so I’m not sure the reason to implement it. Is it possible for Fuse validators to somehow game the tx fees?
Basing inflation/defaltion on tx volume (by burning fees) takes inflation out of the hands of a DAO. It’s then impossible to manage should one want to. With variable inflation comes uncertainty, which is never a good thing for any participant on the network.
Overall, I think the network can already handle reducing inflation to 0, and even (probably) setting a maximum amount of tokens in the future. So why introduce a variable tx fee burning?
I may be missing something here?